tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3878677187737032554.post-36611457030410004752007-11-08T19:24:00.000-05:002007-11-08T19:24:00.000-05:002007-11-08T19:24:00.000-05:00"[R]ais[ing] our voices and work[ing] together to ensure that that uncompromised vision remains a part of the political conversation" are nice-sounding euphemisms for linking arms with fanatical crusaders like Matt Foreman in an attempt to sabotage a bill because it isn't perfect. GLAD should have stuck to impact-litigation, at which it has excelled, and stayed out of the divisive United ENDA campaign to malign and undermine legislators like Barney Frank who have their own expertise at achieving practical legislative reform. If GLAD prefers to sneer disdainfully at the legislative process, then it should do so from the sidelines.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com