Post by Laura Kiritsy, Manager of Public Education
Things have changed dramatically from 10 years ago, when the
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling in our Goodridge marriage lawsuit pitched Beacon Hill -- along with our
usual opponents in the Catholic Church hierarchy and the religious right -- into
a state of hysteria.
“Opposition set in in about one nano-second,” Mary Bonauto
recalled in the documentary film Saving Marriage. That sounds about right.
The knee-jerk reactions from our then governor, attorney general,
House speaker and Senate president (none of whom still hold office) was that this
historic decision just could not stand, sparking years of legislative battling
– which our community ultimately won – to protect Goodridge
from a constitutional amendment banning marriage between same-sex couples that
would have rendered the decision moot.
In the midst of the uncertainty about whether the amendment
would pass, the very first marriages between same-sex couples anywhere in the
country began on May 17, 2004. As the associate editor of Bay Windows newspaper at the time, I had a front row seat to
history for which I’ll be forever grateful.
To this day, I still get goose bumps and a little misty when
I recall the wedding of Rob Compton and David Wilson at Boston’s Arlington
Street Church on that glorious spring day. As the first of the seven Goodridge plaintiff couples to marry
that day, the emotion in the crowded church was palpable. As I wrote
at the time:
[The] tears of joy gave way to a
far more unbridled emotional display when the Reverend Kim Crawford Harvie
raised her right hand over the couple and said what Wilson and Compton - and
countless others in the pews - have long waited to hear: "And now by the
power vested in me by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts," said Crawford
Harvie, at which point the sanctuary erupted in a rafter-rattling burst of
applause, foot stomping and cheers that abated just long enough for her to say,
"I pronounce you partners for life, legally married."
After waiting so long and working so hard for equality,
those words were truly cathartic.
From there, I hustled off to Newton, where plaintiffs
Maureen Brodoff and Ellen Wade tied the knot in the office of then-mayor David
Cohen, jammed together with their families and a media swarm. Again, the feeling of “at last” permeated the
proceedings, exemplified best when Maureen addressed
her parents, who married when her mother was just 19, during the ceremony:
"Ellen and I have waited 24
years to get married," Brodoff told her parents, who were seated among
Brodoff's three sisters and Wade's sister and her nephew, "but let me tell
you - not to disapprove of your choice to get married so young, waiting does
have its advantages. You were young and foolish, but lucky enough to have
become perfect mates for each other. Here there is no luck involved. I know
exactly who it is that I'm marrying and this marriage is, for that reason, so
much more precious.”
Ellen and Maureen joined us yesterday in the Boston
Public Garden to celebrate nine years of
marriage equality in Massachusetts with a group photo of married couples and
other supporters of the freedom to marry.
Boston's Mayor Thomas Menino honored the day with a statement of support, and current Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick reflected on the joy - and ordinariness - of marriage equality in the Commonwealth in the Washington Post.
As we celebrate the anniversary of marriage in
Massachusetts, it’s inspiring and encouraging to know that more and more
Americans are coming around to supporting the freedom to marry for same-sex
couples.
For four years after the Goodridge
ruling, Massachusetts stood alone as a marriage equality state, until
California (however briefly) and Connecticut joined in 2008. Now, we get three
marriage states in the span of two weeks – on top of the three marriage states
we picked up at the ballot box last November, bringing us to a total of 12
along with the District of Columbia. That’s some serious progress.
On the other hand, there’s still 38 states where loving,
committed couples and their children are not treated the same as all other
families.
The Supreme Court is currently weighing two cases that could
dramatically alter the trajectory of the marriage movement. Congress is
grappling with whether to include a provision to allow LGBT Americans to
sponsor foreign-born spouses or partners for U.S. citizenship in the
immigration reform billAnd we continue to wait for movement on the Employment
NonDiscrimination Act (ENDA). There’s a lot of work yet to be done.
Today, we celebrate love on this historic day.
Tomorrow, the work continues.
No comments:
Post a Comment